Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 4:34:30 GMT -5
Republicans in the US Senate on Wednesday blocked a bill that would have allowed increased funding for Ukraine. Most Republican lawmakers voted against the bill, according to Hill. Democrats Ed Markey, Bob Menendez, Alex Padilla and Elizabeth Warren, as well as Bernie Sanders – an independent from Vermont – joined the Republicans who refused to support the legislation. The $118 billion package included $60 billion in military aid to Ukraine and $14 billion in military assistance to Israel. Biden touted the bill as a compromise with Republicans who have refused to greenlight more money for Ukraine unless the president agrees to comprehensive border security and immigration reform. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell warned before the vote that there was “no real chance” the bill would pass, as the GOP has been arguing that Biden's offer was not enough to finish effectively “The border crisis.” Other Republicans insisted that a border bill should not be tied to aid to Ukraine. “This is the most outrageous thing I have been a part of in my 16 years in Congress.” Sen. Chris Murphy told NBC News shortly after the vote.
We have learned that Trump is totally and completely in charge of the party and they are otherwise directionless." Murphy was referring to former President Donald Trump's staunch opposition to Biden's bill. Trump, who is on track to become the Republican nominee to challenge Biden in the November presidential election, has described the Paraguay WhatsApp Number proposed deal as “a sophisticated trap” and urged Republicans to oppose it. The vote came as Ukraine desperately needs additional funding following its failed 2023 counteroffensive against Russian troops. kyiv officials have been urging the Western government to provide more ammunition, warning that the Russians could gain the advantage on the battlefield.For example, Yann LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, argued that “most books” (those that do not make “significant money”) should be “freely available for download” because of the good they would do for society. (And by “society” he seems to mean generative AI and other big tech companies.) While copyright terms are absolutely bloated (thanks, Disney), experts also recognize that copyright laws primarily benefit corporations rather than individuals, who rarely have the legal muscle to defend their rights. rights.
In their own way, it's hard not to see OpenAI, Meta, and other tech companies perpetuating that imbalance. SEE EVERYTHING But given that there are powerful corporate interests in keeping copyright laws strong, generative AI companies are likely to argue that their models, while based on copyrighted works, are “transformative.” That is, your results create something clearly new and completely different from your models' training materials. Related Article: Generative AI for Email Personalization: A Hallucination Wrapped in Confusion AI Copyright Infringement: Navigating the Legal Complexities of Generative AI Of course, hardly a day goes by without compelling evidence that generative AI models routinely infringe or even outright regurgitate copyrighted material. Still, this is likely a winning strategy, given the courts' poor understanding of the technology and precedents such as Authors Guild v. Google, where Google was finally allowed to scan books without the consent of the authors or the need to compensate them for their Google Books. product. That lawsuit took about a decade to resolve.
We have learned that Trump is totally and completely in charge of the party and they are otherwise directionless." Murphy was referring to former President Donald Trump's staunch opposition to Biden's bill. Trump, who is on track to become the Republican nominee to challenge Biden in the November presidential election, has described the Paraguay WhatsApp Number proposed deal as “a sophisticated trap” and urged Republicans to oppose it. The vote came as Ukraine desperately needs additional funding following its failed 2023 counteroffensive against Russian troops. kyiv officials have been urging the Western government to provide more ammunition, warning that the Russians could gain the advantage on the battlefield.For example, Yann LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, argued that “most books” (those that do not make “significant money”) should be “freely available for download” because of the good they would do for society. (And by “society” he seems to mean generative AI and other big tech companies.) While copyright terms are absolutely bloated (thanks, Disney), experts also recognize that copyright laws primarily benefit corporations rather than individuals, who rarely have the legal muscle to defend their rights. rights.
In their own way, it's hard not to see OpenAI, Meta, and other tech companies perpetuating that imbalance. SEE EVERYTHING But given that there are powerful corporate interests in keeping copyright laws strong, generative AI companies are likely to argue that their models, while based on copyrighted works, are “transformative.” That is, your results create something clearly new and completely different from your models' training materials. Related Article: Generative AI for Email Personalization: A Hallucination Wrapped in Confusion AI Copyright Infringement: Navigating the Legal Complexities of Generative AI Of course, hardly a day goes by without compelling evidence that generative AI models routinely infringe or even outright regurgitate copyrighted material. Still, this is likely a winning strategy, given the courts' poor understanding of the technology and precedents such as Authors Guild v. Google, where Google was finally allowed to scan books without the consent of the authors or the need to compensate them for their Google Books. product. That lawsuit took about a decade to resolve.